Public proof, buyer-ready routes, and honest readiness signals for HOWFAR.
Evidence-backed trust center. This page is designed so customers, partners, and reviewers can inspect what is verified now, what proof surfaces exist, and where work is still in progress.
The Trust Center is meant to make diligence faster: machine-readable endpoints, public buyer surfaces, evidence-backed claims, and explicit disclosure of what is not fully proven yet.
- Machine-readable trust routes
- Buyer and diligence links
- Known gaps called out directly
What is verified now
16/16 checks currently pass across architecture, implementation, foundation, and operations.
Health, build, readiness, status, and metrics endpoints are committed and available for monitoring and verification.
The repo includes passkey/WebAuthn support, audit-aware administration, and scripted verification gates for deployment confidence.
Status, security, compliance, pricing, support, contact, and investor-relations pages give buyers clear review surfaces.
Verified buyer reviews, seller processing/refund operations, seller listing management, and buyer-side catalog controls are now shipped and test-covered.
Direct messaging, wallet activity, notifications, and activity summary flows were revalidated in integration tests during the P0 proof-and-stability tranche.
Machine-readable proof
Machine-readable category scores derived from repo evidence and verification scripts.
Summary of public proof links, buyer-ready routes, and known open gaps.
Detailed capability-by-capability reality check showing which features are LIVE, PARTIAL, or PLANNED.
Reports the currently serving build commit and deployment context.
Lightweight service health response with build-aware diagnostics.
Runtime dependency readiness for the app shell and core APIs.
Fast status endpoint for uptime monitors and human spot checks.
Prometheus-style operational metrics for observability tooling.
Buyer and diligence routes
Human-readable summary of verified signals, buyer routes, and known open gaps.
Operational status and incident communication surface.
Security posture, vulnerability reporting, and verification entry points.
Governance posture and how compliance claims should be evaluated.
Commercial plans with an enterprise trust path for diligence.
Sales, support, compliance, security, and investor outreach entry point.
Long-horizon platform thesis and governance posture for strategic stakeholders.
Enterprise readiness signals
Security, compliance, status, pricing, contact, and investor-relations routes are live for diligence and procurement review.
Local verification, predeploy verification, live verification, and strict proof scripts are all present in package scripts.
Public status surfaces pair with authenticated admin security and observability areas for internal operations.
Known open gaps
We do not treat “not yet proven” as “done.” These are the areas that still need more product or verification work before stronger claims would be fair.
The detailed feature matrix still includes PARTIAL and PLANNED capabilities, so the repo now tracks honest completion through a strict activation manifest instead of flipping everything to LIVE by declaration.
Marketplace ordering still lacks public evidence for stock deduction and oversell prevention.
The k6 harness is in-repo and the Windows Docker path handling was hardened, but smoke/stress artifacts still need to be generated and published before stronger resilience claims are fair.
Automated accessibility proof now passes for the covered production routes, but manual screen-reader notes and independent audit artifacts are not yet published.
How to evaluate HOWFAR honestly
- Check the public proof routes and compare them against the routes you care about.
- Use the status, security, and compliance pages for diligence context.
- Ask for the exact critical-path proof you need instead of relying on broad slogans.